During the last few years we have seen the transformation of libraries with traditional print and electronic materials to the virtual library, “Dewey-less” library, and now the bookless library. Each library type has a place and purpose.
The virtual library is used every day through public library databases and online access to Wikipedia and other search engines. The more books, maps, and archived materials get digitalized, the more information is at our fingertips. We all use it to get quick answers to that “burning question.”
The “Dewey-less” library is not about removing printed materials from the physical space, but making materials easy to browse and accessible. It’s about lowering bookshelves, setting up shelves that encourage face-out displays, and providing appropriate signage based on subject. By using the bookstore model for organizing and displaying physical collections, libraries have found their circulation increasing tremendously.
The bookless library raises the most controversy in this market. As a recent article in Time Magazine states, the concept started when university engineering libraries found that printed materials were not being used and the need for student space to access electronic databases far outweighed the need for collection space. We are now seeing this idea spread through academic libraries in general. The library still represents a center for knowledge and information; however, it is evolving into the commons of the institution. Academic libraries today include cafes, 24-hour computer access, and individual and collaboration study areas.
I understand the reasons for all of these changes and love the great learning and social spaces being created in libraries. The wide variety of spaces often result in more open, flexible designs flooded with sunlight, and include all types of mobile furniture to support the new learning environments.
Personally, I still love to browse the shelves and hold a good book in my hand, but I appreciate the size, weight, and practicality of my nook and the depth of Wikipedia.
